Kai Lemstra vs Daniel Kossek Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L W L W L L
Form
W L W L W W L L L LHead To Head: Lemstra 1 - 0 Kossek
They have played 2 sets in total, with Lemstra winning 2 and Kossek winning 0. The last match between Lemstra and Kossek was at the M15 Sharm El Sheikh, 28-10-2019, Q2 round, Hard with Kai Lemstra getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kai Lemstra | 1 |
| Daniel Kossek | 0 |
| Lemstra | Stats | Kossek |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 871 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 836 | Highest Rank | |
| 25 | Age | 28 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 55% (148-119) | Career Total W/L | 23% (31-101) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kai Lemstra vs Daniel Kossek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Lemstra 1 - 0 Kossek
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lemstra has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Kossek has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lemstra, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kossek has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lemstra has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kossek has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lemstra has won 33.33% of matches played (W/L 1/ 2), with Kossek winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lemstra has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 53/ 28), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 16/ 21). Kossek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 29% (W/L 27/ 67), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 11% (W/L 4/ 34).
- Player level: In the last year, Lemstra has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 1/ 2), where as Kossek has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lemstra winning 1 times and Kossek being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lemstra winning 2 and Kossek winning 0. The last match between Lemstra and Kossek was at the M15 Sharm El Sheikh, 28-10-2019, Q2 round, Hard with Kai Lemstra getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lemstra and Kossek have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lemstra winning 0 times and Kossek 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lemstra winning 0, and Kossek 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lemstra has played against opponents with an average rank of 711.67 while Kossek has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lemstra has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kossek has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lemstra has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kossek has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Kai Lemstra Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Marcel Zielinski
Player
Kai Lemstra
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
Player
Kai Lemstra
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
78%
(
28 of
36)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kai Lemstra
Player
Gergely Madarasz
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve %
60%
(
15 of
25)
1
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
36%
(
12 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
33
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Iannis Miletich
Player
Kai Lemstra
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kai Lemstra
Player
Adrian Oetzbach
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
96)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
8
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
96)
99
Total Points Won
88
|
6-1 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Guerrieri
Player
Kai Lemstra
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kai Lemstra
Player
Cristian Cauzzi
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tommaso Compagnucci
Player
Kai Lemstra
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kirill Kivattsev
Player
Kai Lemstra
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
17
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vincent Marysko
Player
Kai Lemstra
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
12
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
90%
(
27 of
30)
73%
(
22 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
22%
(
14 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
17 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Kossek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thanapet Chanta
Player
Daniel Kossek
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve %
0%
(
0 of
5)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
100%
(
1 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
5)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
8
Total Points Won
1
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kapeesh Khandge
Player
Daniel Kossek
54%
(
41 of
76)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
53%
(
40 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 2-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mariano Alberto Hasenkopf
Player
Daniel Kossek
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve %
47%
(
16 of
34)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
96%
(
24 of
25)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
4 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
51
Total Points Won
16
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 1-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-3 11-9 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Where To Watch Lemstra vs Kossek?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Lemstra Vs Kossek is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (148/119) | Win/Loss | 23% (31/101) |
| 55% (327/265) | Sets Win/Loss | 26% (73/211) |
| 53% (2911/2551) | Games Win/Loss | 38% (929/1506) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 321 | Aces Total | 40 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 496 | Total Double Faults | 135 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 369.58 | Average Opponent Rank | 244.36 |
| 63% (6136/9715) | 1st Serve % | 60% (916/1539) |
| 63% (3867/6136) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (513/916) |
| 48% (1717/3579) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (208/622) |
| 43% (424/991) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (31/94) |
| 41% (3971/9743) | Return Points Win % | 32% (430/1363) |
| 55% (145/264) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 23% (31/132) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (28/53) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 39% (7/18) |
| 44% (27/61) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (9/20) |
| 88% (156/137) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (32/26) |
| 12% (156/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (32/6) |
| 9% (111/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 5% (100/5) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
